In the books, SEC custody rules are supposed to protect client funds and securities. In practice, institutions are choosing among paths that range from traditional bank-like custody to regulated crypto-specific safekeeping—and a growing debate over whether self-custody can or should be permitted for crypto assets under an updated framework. The ongoing policy dialogue is not a tax or a hype cycle; it dictates how trillions of dollars in institutional capital may be stored, audited, and arm's-lengthed from risk. As regulators weigh modernization, the industry is already testing guardrails in real time. (sec.gov)
SEC Custody Rules in Practice for Institutional Holders: How US Institutions Are Navigating the New Safekeeping Landscape for Crypto Assets
NOUTITA NEWSROOM·17 OCT. 2026 À 06:01 (UTC+1)·6 MIN READ
SEC & MiCA REGULATION
REGULATION ET INSTITUTIONNEL
noutita.com#REGULATION-ET-INSTITUTIONNEL
In Brief (TL;DR)
An institutional ledger on custody: as the SEC weighs modernizing safeguards, big investors test paths from traditional qualified custodians to limited self-custody, shaping how crypto assets are safeguarded in the US.
Published by Noutita Newsroom. Verified on-chain data and block-stamped metrics.